All news is verified and thoroughly reviewed by leading blockchain experts and seasoned industry insiders.
- Arbitrum DAO votes on whether to release 30,766 frozen ETH to DeFi United after Kelp DAO attack.
- Arbitrum’s security board froze the funds on April 20 after the attacker moved them to an Arbitrum One address.
DAO decision It opened a governance vote on whether to release 30,766 Ethereum to DeFi United, following the Kelp DAO attack and emergency freeze by Arbitrum’s security board.
The frozen ETH now needs management approval
the vote It started with strong early support. In the first hour, 16.9 million ARB tokens were cast in favor of the proposal, while no votes were recorded against it. Voting will remain open until May 7.
And it was money Frozen On April 20 after the Kelp DAO attacker transferred $71.1 million worth of ETH to the Arbitrum One address. The Security Council transferred the assets to the address ending in DA0, effectively locking them until a formal administrative proceeding could determine their release.
At the time, the council said it acted on input from law enforcement regarding the identity of the exploiter. It also said that the intervention is designed to protect the security and safety of the Arbitrum community without impacting users or applications.
Emergency powers are consistent with DAO oversight
This case puts Arbitrum’s management structure to a practical test. Security councils are supposed to act quickly when protocols face urgent threats. In contrast, decentralized autonomous organizations are designed to make consequential decisions through public vote. Here, both mechanisms are used sequentially.
This is important for DeFi. Freezing funds after exploitation has occurred may protect victims or preserve evidence, but it also raises sensitive questions about decentralization, authority, and precedent. Who can intervene, under what circumstances, and how quickly should token holders be asked to agree to the next step?
For Arbitrum, the proposal is not just a transfer request. It’s a prime example of how huge it is Second layer ecosystems He may be dealing with stolen assets when law enforcement, emergency governance, and public symbolic voting come together in the same incident.
