Btc/usd) Beraish trend analysis Read the annotation for BITSTAMP:BTCUSD by SMC-Trading-Point — TradingView


SMC trading point update

Technical Analysis of BTCUSD, 1D, SMC Style Coding):

Current structure
• The price is about 72 thousand dollars
• You’ve got:
• EMA 50 (~70.7K) → acts as short-term support
• EMA 200 (~83.2K) → strong resistance for the higher time frame
• Recent market:
• The price has dropped sharply from the $90,000 to $95,000 range
• A range/consolidation was formed after the decline

This indicates that we are in a bear market structure (lower highs + shift down).

Main Zone (Blue Supply Zone ~80K–83K)
• The highlighted area corresponds to:
• Previous consolidation before the decline
• Either 200
• This is a high potential institutional bid/sell area

If the price goes back there, expect:
• Rejection
• Grab liquidity above the highs of the range
• Continued decline

Current price movement
• The price is compressed below the resistance
• Small upward push = likely a bounce rather than a reversal

👉 This looks like this:

Continuous bearish setup, not accretion

The idea of ​​liquidity and the trap

Your charted path suggests:
1. Simple push-up (liquid grab)
2. Hacking/fake distribution
3. Sharp move down

This corresponds to:
• Buy retail “bounce”
• Smart money distribution to power

Negative goals

You have tagged:
• Target $34,458

This is realistic if:
• The overall downward trend continues
• There are no strong lower-higher forms

Average viewing levels:
• ~$60K → Minor support
• ~$50,000 → Psychological Structure +
• Then → send full to 30-35K area


What might invalidate this bearish idea?
• A strong daily close above 83 thousand
• Holding above this level (turning it into support)
• Breaking the market structure upward

This would flip the bias to a bullish continuation instead.

⸻ Mr. SMC Trading Point

summary
• Trend: bearish
• Current movement: bounce/consolidation
• Main resistance: 80 thousand – 83 thousand
• Bias:
→ Shortage in supply
→ Target less liquidity (~50k → 35k)

Please strengthen this analysis



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *