ICYMI: Fed Governors Goolsbee and Hammack warn inflation risks rise as energy shock bites


Fed officials warn that inflation risks are rising, reinforcing a higher policy stance over the long term.

Earlier, Morgan Stanley argued that interest rates are what stands in the way of further rise in the S&P 500:

This may still be the case if Goolsby and Hammack are right.

summary:

  • Fed officials are referring to inflation as “orange” or worse, indicating growing concern
  • The energy shock and tariffs are cited as major drivers of renewed price pressures

  • Goolsby warns that inflation risks are drifting towards the ‘red’ (stagflationary impulse)

  • Hammack says inflation has been stuck above target for years

  • The labor market is expected to be close to full employment, not a political constraint

  • Payroll is strong, but underlying hiring momentum is mixed

  • The financial system is stable, although concerns have emerged about asset valuation

  • The signals are biased towards policy tightening for a longer period

Senior Federal Reserve officials signal growing concern about rising inflation risks, with policymakers increasingly prioritizing price stability over labor market weakness as geopolitical and energy shocks weigh on the outlook.

In a joint conversation, Austin Goolsby and Beth Hammack described inflation as being at “orange” levels, or worse, within a simplified risk framework (a four-color chart, from “the house is on fire” in red to “everything looks bloated” in green), which underscores that price pressures remain high and may get worse.

Goolsby warned that inflation dynamics have deteriorated in recent months, citing a combination of the effects of ongoing tariffs and a new energy shock linked to the Iranian conflict. He noted that what were previously seen as temporary pressures have proven to be more sustainable, while rising gasoline prices are now adding a stagflationary impetus to the economy. In his assessment, inflation risks are close to “red,” indicating growing concerns that progress toward the Fed’s 2% target may stall or reverse.

Hammack echoed those concerns, noting that inflation has been above target for about five years and has shown little progress over the past two years. Price pressures were described as holding steady in the “orange” region, reinforcing the view that the disinflation process has stalled and may require sustained restrictive policy to control inflation.

The tone of both policymakers suggests a bias towards maintaining tighter monetary settings, especially as inflation expectations worsen while growth remains resilient. It is worth noting that the labor market is not currently viewed as a constraint on policy. Hammack assessed business conditions as generally consistent with full employment, with the unemployment rate close to its equilibrium estimates despite some fragility in participation dynamics.

Recent data reinforces this flexibility. The strong jobs report, showing the largest monthly gain since the start of President Donald Trump’s current term, indicates continued underlying strength in hiring, even as the unemployment rate is affected by labor force shifts.

However, Goolsby offered a more cautious view of business conditions, describing the market as “yellow,” reflecting a low-employment, high-uncertainty environment. This suggests that although employment has stabilized, momentum may be fading beneath the surface.

Regarding financial conditions, Hammack spoke in a relatively constructive tone, saying that the financial system remains stable despite recent stock market volatility linked to geopolitical developments. Goolsby was less optimistic, highlighting concerns about asset valuations and signs that they are “flat,” with uncertainty over whether higher prices are justified by productivity gains or are an indicator of emerging bubbles.

Together, these statements reinforce a political backdrop dominated by concerns about inflation, even as labor market signals remain mixed. With energy prices rising amid the Iranian conflict and financial conditions tightening, the Fed faces a more complex trade-off — one that could delay any shift toward monetary easing and keep interest rates high for longer than markets expect.

Beth Hammack, President and CEO of the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *