HyperLiquid (HYPE) price. It corrected nearly 20% from its recent high near $69, and fell back toward the $60 mark despite what initially appeared to be a bullish regulatory development. Earlier this week, the Hyperliquid Policy Center and Sullivan & Cromwell LLP met with the US Securities and Exchange Commission to discuss the future of cryptocurrency regulation in the US, a development that briefly raised sentiment around the token.
Instead of extending its recovery, HYPE has come under renewed selling pressure. At the same time, on-chain data shows that major holders are transferring hundreds of thousands of HYPE to centralized exchanges, reinforcing distribution concerns after the strong rally the token has seen for several months. With the price now approaching the key $50-$51 support area, traders are asking a more important question than why HYPE is falling: Is this the kind of capitulation that often marks a local bottom, or is the current price action raising the odds of a deeper correction towards $40?
The whale’s excessive liquid flows raise distribution concerns
One of the biggest catalysts behind the recent HYPE correction was a series of large whale transfers to centralized exchanges. On-chain data shows several high-value transactions over the past 24 hours, with wallets transferring more than 437,000 HYPE (worth approximately $28.4 million) to exchanges including OKX, Bybit, and Gate.io.


Several individual transfers exceeded 100,000 HYPE, reinforcing fears that large holders could profit after HyperLiquid’s strong rise over the past few months. While exchange flows do not necessarily confirm an immediate sale, they often increase market caution because cryptocurrencies transferred to exchanges are more likely to be sold than those in private wallets.
Is HyperLiquid giving up?
The HyperLiquid weekly chart suggests that the current sell-off is testing a decisive turning point rather than confirming a long-term trend reversal. After failing to sustain its breakout above $68, HYPE pulled back towards the $50-51 support area, where the uptrend line intersects the previous breakout level. Despite the roughly 20% pullback from recent highs, the broader market structure remains constructive.


The RSI is retreating from overbought conditions while remaining above the neutral 50 level. This suggests that the bullish momentum has weakened but has not yet turned decisively in favor of the sellers. Meanwhile, the CMF remains marginally positive, indicating that capital outflows have been limited despite the recent decline. Selling volume also remained relatively under control, rather than showing the sharp rise typically associated with panic-driven liquidations.
Together, these signals suggest that the current correction resembles profit-taking within an established uptrend, although a decisive break below $50 would weaken this outlook and expose the hype to a deeper correction towards the $40 support area.
Key levels to watch
- Immediate resistance: $60 to $62
- Key resistance: $68 to $70
- Instant Support: $50 to $51
- Main Support: $40 to $42
- Bullish invalidation: decisive close below $50
- Bearish invalidation: Rally above $70
Is the HyperLiquid patch coming to an end?
HyperLiquid’s recent decline appears to have been driven by a combination of whale profit taking, weak momentum, and broader market pressures rather than a collapse in its underlying fundamentals. While large exchange inflows from major holders accelerated the sell-off, the higher time frame chart still shows HYPE trading above the long-term trend line, keeping the broader bullish structure intact.
Currently, the $50-$51 support zone remains the most important level to watch for the Hyper Liquid (HYPE) price rally. A successful defense could mark this correction as a healthy reset within the broader uptrend and set the stage for a recovery towards the $68-$70 resistance zone. However, a decisive break below $50 would invalidate the current structure and increase the likelihood of a deeper correction towards $40.
Until either scenario materializes, traders should focus less on the whale headlines and more on whether price, volume and derivatives data begin to confirm true exhaustion among sellers.
Was this writing helpful?
The story ends here
Trust with CoinPedia:
CoinPedia has been providing accurate and timely cryptocurrency and blockchain updates since 2017. All content is created by our expert team of analysts and journalists, following strict editorial guidelines based on EEAT (Expertise, Expertise, Credibility and Trustworthiness). Each article is fact-checked against reputable sources to ensure accuracy, transparency, and reliability. Our review policy ensures unbiased reviews when recommending exchanges, platforms or tools. We strive to provide timely updates on everything cryptocurrency and blockchain, from startups to industry specialties.
Investment Disclaimer:
All opinions and ideas shared represent the author’s own views on current market conditions. Please do your own research before making investment decisions. Neither the writer nor the publication accepts responsibility for your financial choices.
Sponsored and advertisements:
Sponsored content and affiliate links may appear on our site. Ads are clearly labeled, and our editorial content remains completely independent from our advertising partners.
Read upcoming news





