The oil arrangements that have underpinned global finance for decades are under greater pressure than at any time in recent memory, and the Iran war is accelerating a transformation that is now more complex. Experts say It started years ago.
The Gulf states openly wonder whether the security guarantees provided by Washington include them or include Israel exclusively. The UAE left OPEC. Iran is now reportedly charging tolls for passage through the Strait of Hormuz, and demanding payment in cryptocurrency instead of dollars.
The Financial Times reported that Iran initially requested $2 million per ship, with a more recent figure of $1 per barrel of oil, paid in the cryptocurrency equivalent. The token is not named. Analysts note that it could be Bitcoin, Tether, or any number of assets including XRP.
That’s where XRP enters the conversation
The collapse of dollar-denominated oil trade poses a fundamental question: What will replace SWIFT and correspondent banking in a multipolar world where countries no longer trust each other’s financial systems and cannot trust each other’s banks?
Analysts who follow the XRP ledger say it is in a structural position to answer this question. The ledger settles transactions in about three seconds to a fraction of a cent, eliminates the need for nostro and vostro accounts that tie up idle capital in correspondent banking relationships, and functions as a neutral infrastructure that no sovereign nation controls or can weaponize.
The comparison with how Russia was removed from SWIFT in response to the Ukrainian conflict has not escaped the BRICS countries monitoring the current situation. When a reserve currency can be used as a geopolitical weapon, countries that own that currency face existential financial risks. Neutral bridge assets that cannot be seized or sanctioned address the risks directly.
Complexity of CBDC
Analysts point out that XRP’s role in instant cross-border settlement also creates the technical conditions for central bank digital currencies to operate on a large scale. Programmable money, which governments can target to specific populations and specific use cases, is a tool for financial inclusion, critics say, and a potential control mechanism that depends on who operates it.
The distinction analysts draw is between XRP itself, which cannot be seized or confiscated on the ledger, and stablecoins issued on top of the ledger, which remain subject to redemption features and issuer control. In a world moving toward programmable digital currencies, this distinction is of great importance to those thinking about long-term financial sovereignty.
Was this writing helpful?
The story ends here
Trust with CoinPedia:
CoinPedia has been providing accurate and timely cryptocurrency and blockchain updates since 2017. All content is created by our expert team of analysts and journalists, following strict editorial guidelines based on EEAT (Expertise, Expertise, Credibility and Trustworthiness). Each article is fact-checked against reputable sources to ensure accuracy, transparency, and reliability. Our review policy ensures unbiased reviews when recommending exchanges, platforms or tools. We strive to provide timely updates on everything cryptocurrency and blockchain, from startups to industry specialties.
Investment Disclaimer:
All opinions and ideas shared represent the author’s own views on current market conditions. Please do your own research before making investment decisions. Neither the writer nor the publication accepts responsibility for your financial choices.
Sponsored and advertisements:
Sponsored content and affiliate links may appear on our site. Ads are clearly labeled, and our editorial content remains completely independent from our advertising partners.
Read upcoming news
