author
Ahmed Barakat
author
Share
Fact verified by
CryptoNews editorial team
author
Chris Perkins of Franklin Templeton argues that the $2.7 trillion cryptocurrency market does not need the Law of Clarity to survive. Despite months of Senate gridlock over historic market structure legislation, the industry has already proven it can grow, attract capital, and build institutional pipelines without a federal regulatory framework.
The Clarity Act won House approval last July, by a bipartisan 294-134 vote, attracting unanimous support from Republicans and 78 Democrats. Since then, the Senate has stumbled on three stubborn issues: stablecoin revenue language, DeFi provisions, and securing the full Republican committee caucus needed to advance.
Senate Banking Committee Chairman Tim Scott identified these pressure points on April 14, 2026calling for each to be resolved within two weeks, a deadline that has already passed.
Discover: The best pre-launch token sales
Where the law of clarity actually stands
The path from the Senate Banking Committee to presidential signature involves five separate steps: committee formation and vote, the 60-vote threshold in the Senate, reconciliation with the Agriculture Committee’s Digital Commodity Intermediaries Act, House-Senate conference, and then signing.
Every step is a potential kill zone. Senator Thom Tillis requested additional time to review stablecoin regulation and yield structures in late April, prompting the Banking Commission to raise interest rates from April to May, the third review of the timeline in as many months. Although it seems like it has already been resolved.
Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse has now twice changed his forecast: 80% odds by the end of April on February 19, and revised to the end of May on April 13, citing what he called a “peak of frustration” as an indication that settlement was near.
Polymarket pricing puts the 2026 legislation at 50-50 or lower. Passage may ultimately require a deal that dissatisfies both cryptocurrency lobbyists and the banking industry alike, which is a rough definition of a viable settlement, noted TD Coin analyst Jarrett Seberg.
Senator Cynthia Lummis made it clear at the Bitcoin 2026 conference:
“We will be coding the CLARITY Act in May… and we will get it to the finish line.”
It also issued the clearest warning about failure: stalling in 2026 would likely mean no market structure legislation until 2030 or later. Procedural delay?
Discover: The best cryptocurrencies to diversify your investment portfolio
Are cryptocurrencies actually “good”?
The executive argument is not unfounded. Institutional adoption has accelerated without a federal framework: BlackRock’s IBIT and Fidelity’s FBTC have each pulled billions in net ETF flows, With real-time Bitcoin CVD data confirming strong institutional buying even amid regulatory uncertainty.
Combined, USDT and USDC stablecoins now support more than $100 billion in daily trading volume globally, and the market capitalization of stablecoins has exceeded $320 billion without the stablecoin regulation provisions of the Clarity Act ever becoming law.
The “good” argument is basically this: the ambiguity of US cryptocurrency policy has not killed the market. Grayscale’s court wins against the SEC, ETF approvals, and offshore liquidity have collectively done what legislation has not. The industry has adapted.
Discover: The best cryptocurrencies you can buy right now
